Thursday, May 15, 2008

Robert Latimer Supporter with Confederate Flag

http://www.facebook.com/s.php?k=100000004&id=5575696199&gr=2&hash=fa7a56808600a5905993e35ab90e2152&s=630&hash=7c3353367c750f763bc2f937ac9ffe7d A Robert Latimer support here has a confederate flag symbol. The confederate flag is often associated with Confederate Slavocracy as well as the Ku Klux Klan.

Thursday, May 8, 2008

More Fascist Solidarity for Robert Latimer

There appear to be more outright fascists who support Robert Latimer. One from the Vanguard News Network exclaimed about the Robert Latimer case "It sickens me to see this brave and righteous man being kept in jail for doing what was right. At the same time, degenerate criminals who commit real crime and do real harm to society are consistently slapped on the wrist by the system." They go on to say "disabled rights/anti-euthanasia fanatics are an enemy of the white race. An egalitarian cause often overlooked as a tool used to weaken and destroy the White race."
A fascist from Phora remarked "This brave man aught to be rewarded for what he did, not punished!!" Another from the same sight remarked "Sounds like the actions he took were entirely reasonable, and don't warrant any criminal conviction." (see. http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=32828)

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Fascist Vermin Crawl Out of their Holes, to show their Solidarity for Robert Latimer!

It appears Robert Latimer enjoys the backing of outright Fascists. According to the Stormfront White Nationalist Community Robert Latimer "has nothing to apologise for. I'm angry at the way he's been treated as well!" They go on to say "He gets along with everyone because he's a good man who doesn't deserve to be in prison in the first place!" (see. http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/robert-latimer-denied-parole-444322.html).

Another from this group describes the Robert Latimer's sentence as "harsh" and describes the Free Robert Latimer Movement as a "Many of the good people that joined me in our march to free Robert Latimer". He also describes Robert Latimer as a "POW" (see.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?p=1308899).

Also a member from this same group
talks about how "Two years ago the socialist, egalitarian communists in the supreme court of Canada made him serve a minimum of 10 YEARS in prison!!" They go on to say that Robert Latimer "did what the GOVERNMENT should have done for them 12 years earlier."

They then state:


"The powers that be were under prusure from a small group of disabled rights activists to hammer him as hard as they could. These disabled rights activists are part of what I consider an axis of evil. That is a leftist special interests group who's agenda hurts society and the race as a whole. Natrually when these bastards say jump, the jew controled system asks how high?"



According to another member from the same organization "political prisioners like Ernst Zuldel, Brad Love, and Robert Latimer are punished to the full extent of the law.


It's time this government is reined in."


According to another, again an outright fascist referring to himself as 'White Renegade':



"Meanwhile, our Canadian government was spending millions of dollars prosecuting and imprisoning Robert Latimer for euthanizing his severely handicapped child, who couldn't walk, talk or feed herself. Robert Latimer's child was resuscitated at birth, only to enslave her family for the next 12 years, not to mention all of the taxpayer's money that was spent on her medical and "school" expenses. The government kept this child alive by artificial means at the taxpayers expense. Robert Latimer euthanized his child, which would have saved the taxpayer countless dollars if it wasn't for the fact that they turn around and spend MORE tax money persecuting Robert Latimer in the courts."

http://www.scritube.com/limba/engleza/human-resources/WHITE-RENECADE557141114.php


Not to be outdone by another from Stormfront:



"The anti-White, Jew controled government of Canada gave Robert Latimer the maximun sentence possible for euthanizing his severely disabled 12 year old daughter who could not walk, talk of feed itself. The Canadian government usually reserves it's harshest punishments for those who go against their Marxist, Jewish establishment."



There rhetoric isn't even that different from the Bourgeois Press or the Free Robert Latimer Movement. All three groups use terms like "she was dead the day she was born", "she was in continual agony", "Robert Latimer was relieving Tracy of her pain", "keeping Tracy alive and jailing Robert Latimer are a waste of tax dollars" etc.

I rest my case.

Comradely,

M.G.


Fascists who Support Robert Latimer:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/robert-latimer-denied-parole-444322.html Robert Latimer Denied Parole - Stormfront White Nationalist Community


http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/abuse-medical-technoloy-39054.html Abuse of Technology - Stormfront White Nationalist Community



On the "Oppresion" of Robert Latimer

Some supporters of Robert Latimer have argued that he is oppressed like the daughter he lynched. I have already pointed out that Mr. Latimer is white, male and heterosexual, non of which are oppressed. I should probably point out that Robert Latimer is a farmer. Apparently, the average farmer in Canada has one million dollars in assets putting them on the upper stratum of the petty-bourgeoisie. This would mean that Robert Latimer is most likely a Kulak.

Also, there have been supporters of Robert Latimer who have argued that the fact that alot of Robert Latimer's supporters are white guys with shaved heads doens't mean anything. First of all, there have been cadre in your Trotskyist League that have said that if a white guy with a shaved head approached them at your rally that they would expect a physical confrontation. Also, the supporters of Robert Latimer would make remarks like "Tracy Latimer was dead the day she was born". These remarks are not unlike Hitler's justification for killing the disabled in the gas chambers during the "Final Solution". Hitler described the disabled as "life unworthy of life" or "lives not worth living". Hitler also referred to these killings as "mercy killings". Robert Latimer too used this term to describe his murder of his daughter. So, both the Free Robert Latimer Movement and the Nazis consider disabled "lives not worth living", both describe the murder of the disabled as "mercy killings", both are mostly white people with shaved heads and most importantly both considered it acceptable to murder the disabled. In fact, disabled people were only the first victims of the Holocaust.

And with all due respects I don't think the Internationalist Communist League (Fourth Internationalist) and its sections, including the Spartacist League (US) and the Trotskyist League of Canada, adequately champions the rights of the disabled. The party doesn't recruit and also expels people for having mental illnesses and disabilities. The party uses remarks like "senile", "demented", "nuts", "psychotic" and "schizophrenic" as insults. I have not come across a single article by the party devoted to the rights of the disabled. And now there are people in your party who support Robert Latimer who lynched is disabled daughter. I don't like pointing the finger but I really think the party really needs to change its attitude towards the disabled.

Comradely,
M.G.

Monday, May 5, 2008

Parallels between the Lynching of Tracy Latimer and the Lynching of Emmett Till

I had been advised from one of your cadre to reread the Lynching of Emmett Till in response to my earlier emails on Tracy Latimer (where I called Tracy's killing a lynching). I have read it for the third time. I have already seen the Documentary The Untold Story of Emmett Louis Till by Keith Beauchamp. I have also seen Malcolm X by Spike Lee.

After having reading the above books and articles and watching the above movies I fully stand by accusing of Robert Latimer of lynching. I in fact noticed several parrellels between the two. First of all, Tracy Latimer had cerebral palsy and was mentally challenged, both of which make her an oppressed person. Emmett Till was oppressed for being black. Second, Robert Latimer admitted to having planned Tracy's murder in advance yet only got convicted with second degree murder not first degree murder. I believe Emmett Till's killer's admitted to killing him but got acquitted. Although Latimer was not acquitted there have been plenty of cases similar to the Latimer case (where a caregiver kills a disabled person in their care) where the killers get acquitted, are not charged or get a light sentence like manslaughter. Third, Robert Latimer, like Roy Bryant and J.W. Milam had a great deal of public sympathy as well as sympathy from the Bourgeois Press. And finally, although not in the Latimer case, there have been similar cases of disabled people being murdered by their caregivers that have involved beating to death, stabbing to death and ways similar to the lynching of Emmett Till. Robert Latimer, however, gassed his daughter to death which how the Nazis like to do it. I should probably point out that the killing of Tracy wasn't as ritualized as the most ritualized lynchings.

One of your cadre, rather had argued in the defense of Robert Latimer saying "their is a big long history of rural types being blamed for their own oppression". I should probably point out that Mississippi during the lynching of Emmett Till was quite rural. Judging by the above cadre's argument, Roy Bryant and J.W. Milam are just "rural types being blamed for their own oppression".

Comradely,
M.G.

Once More and Again on the Rights of the Disabled

Frankly, I think the idea that Tracy Latimer and Robert Latimer "are both oppressed" or "suffered together" is ludicrous (as I have mentioned before). The fact that Robert Latimer was here father does not mean that he necessarily mean he acted in her best interests. Women in Islamic countries are stoned to death by their own relatives. Homosexual children have been killed by homophobic parents. I have even heard of white supremecists parents adopting non-white kids and killing them. Need I not mention that the family is the nucleus of women, youth and gay oppression. Tracy Latimer was a youth, meaning she was oppressed by the family.

There is also a big long history of parents killing their children for their disability. There is also a big long history of the murderers of the disabled getting light sentences (see. http://thiswayoflife.org/murder.html, http://www.phen.ab.ca/materials/het/het12-01c.asp, http://www.ragged-edge-mag.com/drn/latimer0402.html, http://enablelink.ca/include/article.php?aid=1024&cid=&pid=&subid=%20). Robert Latimer admitted in court that he planned to murder Tracy twelve days in advance (see. http://dawn.thot.net/Tracy_Latimer.html). Under Canadian law premeditated murder should count as first-degree murder (see. http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/C-46//20080505/en?command=HOME&caller=SI&fragment=First%20Degree%20Murder&search_type=all&day=5&month=5&year=2008&search_domain=cs&showall=L&statuteyear=all&lengthannual=50&length=50). Robert Latimer got convicted of second-degree murder.

As for whether the killing of Tracy Latimer was meant to terrorize the oppressed. Even if it weren't the intent of Robert Latimer that is the affect. It has served to terrorized the disabled community and almost all in that community fear that it will lead to more killing. According to Dick Sobsey, Head of the JP Das Centre for Developmental Disabilities at the University Alberta, the killing of Tracy Latimer and sympathy for Robert Latimer has lead to an increase in the murdering of disabled (see. http://www.phen.ab.ca/materials/het/het12-01c.asp, http://www.ragged-edge-mag.com/drn/latimer0402.html).

I have gotten back from a couple individual cadre from the Trotskyist League (Canadian section of the International Communist League (Fourth Internationalist)) on the Tracy Latimer issue. The impression I got was the party supports Robert Latimer. This, I believe, is a serious betrayel of what the party stands for. The vanguard, I believe, and I think you can agree is meant to defend ALL oppressed people. Defending oppressed people requires making the distinction between the oppressed and the bigots, rednecks and fascistic yahoos who killed oppressed people. I strongly believe, that if you defend Robert Latimer that you are not making this distinction.


PLEASE COME TO YOUR SENSES.
Comradely,
M.G.
Some more information on the Disability Question:
http://amanda.autistics.org/ Amanda Baggs Autism Non-Site
http://web.syr.edu/~jisincla/ Jim Sinclair's Website
http://www.autistics.org/library/ Autism Information Library at Autistics.org
http://www.gopetition.com/online/1390.html Boycott the Movie "The United States of Leland"